PHI 2323 Lecture 12
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
« previous | Wednesday, September 25, 2019 | next »
Review from Last Lecture's Craziness on Existence
- substance
- exists in itself
- accident
- exists as a property or "attachment" to something else
- in potency
- something that could be
- in act
- something that exists right now
- form
- the "what-it-is" of a thing in act
- initially understood as "shape" or "look" (to describe the form of a dog, you would draw a dog)
- matter
- the interior cause, source, "that-from-which"
- initially understood as the stuff of artificial things (bronze in statue, silver in bowl, wood in chair)
- extends to stuff of natural things (flesh and bone)
- privation
- an initial lack of a form (e.g., "unmusical" in "an unmusical man becomes a musical man")
Existence and Change
- General form: "non-…" becomes "…"
- How can something "become" its opposite?
- It's the things that change, not the "what-it-is"
- Hence change requires a composite: a part that changes, and a part that is unchanging
Example: hard butter becomes soft butter
- hard and soft are accidental forms
- butter remains the same through the change
- on its own, it is in potency for its hardness and softness, hence it is the matter
- more specifically, since butter is in potency to the accidental existence of its hardness/softness, it is subject
- on its own, it is in potency for its hardness and softness, hence it is the matter
Another Example: non-athletic Mr. Matteoli becomes athletic Mr. Matteoli
- non-athletic is privation
- non-athletic and athletic are both accidental forms for Mr. Matteoli who is matter (more specifically, subject) to these forms.
A Substantial Change: Freddie the cat is run over by a tractor and becomes Freddie the flat (i.e., non-cat)
- cat and non-cat are substantial forms
- What is the matter? (pun not intended!)
- Must endure through change, yet be in potency to both cat and non-cat
- This is what is called prime matter
- prime matter is the subject of substantial change, and therefore makes up every substance.
Aristotle, De Anima
- Aristotle gives a definition to the soul: "The soul is something of a body"
- not very descriptive, but seems true nonetheless
- prior definition: "The soul is the cause of life within the living body"
- (nearly) every operation of the soul occurs through and in the body
- the soul is not the body because the body still hangs around after death (i.e., after soul goes away)
Aristotle will argue:
- the soul is substance
- the soul is form
- the soul is first actuality
- the body is a natural body
- the body is a natural body composed of tools (could also be translated as "organs")
Hence the goal: the soul is the first actuality of a natural body composed of tools