MATH 470 Lecture 13

From Notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

« previous | Tuesday, February 26, 2013 | next »


Lagrange's Theorem

(special case) offers a way to check if is a generator for

If is prime and ,

Then , where is the smallest exponent with .

Proof. Suppose . Consider .

By the Extended Euclidean Algorithm, there are with .

So then . Since (since , we must have . By construction, , so .

Q.E.D.

Corollary

If is prime and and for all primes ,

Then is a generator of .

In particular, given a list of all primes dividing , you can check the preceding condition in time

Note:
  1. Life is cruel: you usually do NOT have such a list.
  2. If is a product of small primes (to any powers), then life is good!

Proof. We must show that . By Lagrange's theorem, .

So we need to rule out being a divisor of other than .

If is the factorization of , then any dividing must divide or or ... or .

Now for all is equivalent to , ..., . So if , it would divide one of or ... or , which is impossible.

Therefore .

Q.E.D.

Complexity Bounds

By Theorem 5.4.1 (of Bach and Shallit), computing takes bit operations. So computing takes bit operations. By problem 5 of homework 6, the number of primes dividing is


Last Words on RSA

et tu Brute?

To solve problem 1 on the homework, frequency analysis might be useful (decrypt and check that text is in English)

In Ruby,

require 'openssl' base.to_bn.mod_exp(exponent, modulus)

RSA and World Peace

How can the UN monitor Iran's nuclear reactors reliably and still have Iran happy?

Build Good non-tamperable sensors

OR Use RSA as follows: given private large primes and , private decryption key , public encryption key , and large number

If the sensor reads , transmit .

Iran is happy: they can verify that so they know the UN is not transmitting secrets or anything.

The UN is happy: they can compute and check that it really is the supposedly-transmitted .

It is hard to mess with to get and still have . If you mess with and , then you need to know !