« previous | Tuesday, October 29, 2013 | next »
Embedded Quotient Fields
Continuing from previous lecture, after proving that
is a field, we want to show that integral domain
is isomorphic to the field
.
Construct
such that
. We claim
is an isomorphism between
and
. Indeed,
is
- homomorphism
![{\displaystyle i(a)+i(b)=[(a+b,1)]=i(a+b)}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/5f97cb9e15255d6c6ecbcaff89609ba3911935ea)
![{\displaystyle i(a)\cdot i(b)=[(a\cdot b,1)]=i(a\cdot b)}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/1d10dda7503b9b9d3d8ae2c2598b0a0e96d5f528)
- one-to-one (if
, then
implies
)
- onto
(tautology by definition of image; trivial)
Thus we justify the following theorem:
Theorem 21.5
Any integral domain
can be enlarged to (or embedded in) a field
such that every element of
can be expressed as a quotient of two elemens of
.
Such
is called a field of quotients of
.
Note: This theorem explains existence. There is another theorem in the book that explains uniqueness.
Rings of Polynomials
We begin with a ring
.
Let
be an indeterminate or unknown variable.
We denote the ring of polynomials in one indeterminate with coefficients in
as
In general, a polynomial is an infinite formal sum of form:
Where
and
for all but a finite number of values of
.
If
, then we call
the degree of
.
- A polynomial of the form
(degree 0) is called a constant polynomial
(degree 1) is called linear
(degree 2) is called quadratic
- etc.
We define addition and multiplication as follows:
Let
with
Then
Note that
in general.
But if
is commutative, then
is also commutative.
Similarly,
has unity if and only if
has unity, and unity in
will be constant polynomial
.
is isomorphic to subring
, where
is the set of constant polynomials.
Example
is a (finite) field, but
is an infinite field.
, but
, so
in
.
Multiple Indetermintes
We write
to represent all polynomials in two indeterminates with coefficients in
and are expressed as follows:
In this case,
.
Evaluation Homomorphisms
Let
and
be fields with
(
is a subfield of
).
Theorem 22.4
If
,
, then the map
defined by
for
is a homomorphism of
into
. Furthermore,
, and
maps
isomorphically by the identity map; that is,
for
.
The homomorphism
is an evaulation at
.
To take a page from Haskell, an evaluation homomorphism has the following type signature:
eval :: (E a, E b) => (a -> b) -> a -> b
E {$E } ;
phialpha [ below of = E] {$\phi_\alpha(x) = \alpha \in \phi_\alpha(F[x])$} ;
Fx [ left of = phialpha ] {$p \in F[x]$} ;
F [ below of = Fx ] {$a \in F$} ;
phia [ below of = phialpha] {$\phi_\alpha(a) = a \in F$} ;
\draw [->] (Fx) (phialpha) {$\phi_\alpha$} ;
\draw [--] (Fx) (F) ;
\draw [->] (F) (phia) {identity map} ;
\draw [--] (E) (phialpha) ;
\draw [--] (phialpha) (phia) ;