« previous | Tuesday, October 29, 2013 | next »
Embedded Quotient Fields
Continuing from previous lecture, after proving that is a field, we want to show that integral domain is isomorphic to the field .
Construct such that . We claim is an isomorphism between and . Indeed, is
- homomorphism
- one-to-one (if , then implies )
- onto (tautology by definition of image; trivial)
Thus we justify the following theorem:
Theorem 21.5
Any integral domain can be enlarged to (or embedded in) a field such that every element of can be expressed as a quotient of two elemens of .
Such is called a field of quotients of .
Note: This theorem explains existence. There is another theorem in the book that explains uniqueness.
Rings of Polynomials
We begin with a ring .
Let be an indeterminate or unknown variable.
We denote the ring of polynomials in one indeterminate with coefficients in as
In general, a polynomial is an infinite formal sum of form:
Where and for all but a finite number of values of .
If , then we call the degree of .
- A polynomial of the form (degree 0) is called a constant polynomial
- (degree 1) is called linear
- (degree 2) is called quadratic
- etc.
We define addition and multiplication as follows:
Let with
Then
Note that in general.
But if is commutative, then is also commutative.
Similarly, has unity if and only if has unity, and unity in will be constant polynomial .
is isomorphic to subring , where is the set of constant polynomials.
Example
is a (finite) field, but is an infinite field.
, but , so in .
Multiple Indetermintes
We write to represent all polynomials in two indeterminates with coefficients in and are expressed as follows:
In this case, .
Evaluation Homomorphisms
Let and be fields with ( is a subfield of ).
Theorem 22.4
If , , then the map defined by
for is a homomorphism of into . Furthermore, , and maps isomorphically by the identity map; that is, for .
The homomorphism is an evaulation at .
To take a page from Haskell, an evaluation homomorphism has the following type signature:
eval :: (E a, E b) => (a -> b) -> a -> b
E {$E } ;
phialpha [ below of = E] {$\phi_\alpha(x) = \alpha \in \phi_\alpha(F[x])$} ;
Fx [ left of = phialpha ] {$p \in F[x]$} ;
F [ below of = Fx ] {$a \in F$} ;
phia [ below of = phialpha] {$\phi_\alpha(a) = a \in F$} ;
\draw [->] (Fx) (phialpha) {$\phi_\alpha$} ;
\draw [--] (Fx) (F) ;
\draw [->] (F) (phia) {identity map} ;
\draw [--] (E) (phialpha) ;
\draw [--] (phialpha) (phia) ;