MATH 417 Lecture 21

From Notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

« previous | Tuesday, April 8, 2014 | next »


Special Matrices

  • (strictly) Diagonally Dominant: Failed to parse (unknown function "\nej"): {\displaystyle a_{ii} > \sum_{i\nej} (a_{ij})}
  • (strictly) Positive Definite:

Both types are nonsingular, and


Theorem. If is diagonally dominant, then we can perform gaussian elimination without pivoting: ; ;

Proof. After one step of gaussian elimination, we go from matrix to , where for by adding (row 1) × to the -th row:

This is possible because by the diagonally dominant property:

The theorem holds by induction.

quod erat demonstrandum


Theorem. If is positive definite, then

for
for

Proof. Let be a matrix with entries

By definition, we have (or , if )

Define the minor of matrix to be:

for

Lemma: is positive definite if and only if .


Let's start with :

, . if and only if

For :

, and .

We have . If , then ; if , then ; and for any other , we have


For the general case, let . Then .

If , then gives . This is positive if and only if the diagonal entries are positive.


To prove the final property, let and in the previous part. Then .

Now let and . Then .

Hence

quod erat demonstrandum

These conditions are necessary, but not sufficient.


Section 7.1: Norms

In general, solving for costs .

If is a good matrix (not identity) positive definite, given , find such that and

Let be a linear space (closed on addition and scalar multiplication)

Definition. is a norm if:

  1. for
  2. for all scalars
  3. .


Most important vector norms:

  1. for