PHL 3305 Lecture 27
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
« previous | Friday, November 8, 2019 | next »
How do we start?
First premises (things that are known to be true) have to be known prior for syllogism to even work
Three "difficulties":
- whether the knowledge of the immediate principles is the same or not
- whether or not there is scientific knowledge of each
- whether the knowledge is innate and, if so, this knowledge could go unnoticed
In answer to the third,
- we come to know things innately through experience
- senses are a stream of information; we extract universals from this stream through induction
- process called abstraction
In answer to the first two,
- there are two types of science
Against Descartes
- Descartes gives primacy to doubht
- according to human nature, knowledge is prior to doubt
- doubt isn't even a virtue
- apparently, Descartes didn't start from doubt either... He had his childhood experiences, education, and resulting knowledge