« previous | Tuesday, February 18, 2014 | next »
Section 4.1: Numerical Differentiation
Given some points
,
, and
, approximate
using the values
,
, and
within
accuracy.
Taylor Method:
To cancel the
term, we need to multiply the first equation by 16 and subtract the equations. Doing so yields
Now we solve for
:
Section 4.3: Numerical Integration
Given an interval
, we want to find
.
To do this, we must find a rule with the least degree of accuracy (DAC) such that the approximation is equivalent for polynomials of degree
.
Hence we get the system
The solution:
,
, and
Hence the approximation is equal for polynomials of degree 2:
.
This approximation does not work for polynomials of degree 3 because
is "approximated" to be 0, but is actually positive.
Shifted and Scaled Interval
Using the previous approximation, we want to approximate
. The interval maps correspondingly:
We keep the same coefficients, but multiply by the ratio of the new interval length to the old:
We keep the same degree of accuracy (i.e. 2) because shifting and scaling is just a linear change of variables.
We can find an alternate rule if we keep the other endpoint (i.e. 10):
Composite Simpson's Rule
As done by Stirling (ca. 1730)
Simpson's rule:
This rule is exact for polynomials of of up to degree 3, hence DAG = 3
We are going to need the following theorem:
Theorem. [Intermediate Value Theorem]. let
and
be continuous functions with
(without loss of generality) on an interval
. Then
If
,
quod erat demonstrandum
Given
, we interpolate at
,
,
, and
(Find
).
The first 3 terms are the Lagrange interpolating polynomial
, and the third is "more" ... something to do with
.
Now
Now
, so we're left with the integral of the interpolating polynomial
:
Computing the Error
So
Let
, and
Then
by the intermediate value theorem.
Let
and
, then
Therefore, the error is
Composite Rule
Suppose we apply Simpson's rule
times (hence we need
points) over a large interval
. In other words, we take
sub-intervals of
that have equal length.
Where
.
Simplifying the expression above gives
The error of this composite is given by
Hence