« previous | Tuesday, February 18, 2014 | next »
Section 4.1: Numerical Differentiation
Given some points , , and , approximate using the values , , and within accuracy.
Taylor Method:
To cancel the term, we need to multiply the first equation by 16 and subtract the equations. Doing so yields
Now we solve for :
Section 4.3: Numerical Integration
Given an interval , we want to find .
To do this, we must find a rule with the least degree of accuracy (DAC) such that the approximation is equivalent for polynomials of degree .
Hence we get the system
The solution: , , and
Hence the approximation is equal for polynomials of degree 2:
.
This approximation does not work for polynomials of degree 3 because is "approximated" to be 0, but is actually positive.
Shifted and Scaled Interval
Using the previous approximation, we want to approximate . The interval maps correspondingly:
We keep the same coefficients, but multiply by the ratio of the new interval length to the old:
We keep the same degree of accuracy (i.e. 2) because shifting and scaling is just a linear change of variables.
We can find an alternate rule if we keep the other endpoint (i.e. 10):
Composite Simpson's Rule
As done by Stirling (ca. 1730)
Simpson's rule:
This rule is exact for polynomials of of up to degree 3, hence DAG = 3
We are going to need the following theorem:
Theorem. [Intermediate Value Theorem]. let and be continuous functions with (without loss of generality) on an interval . Then
If ,
quod erat demonstrandum
Given , we interpolate at , , , and (Find ).
The first 3 terms are the Lagrange interpolating polynomial , and the third is "more" ... something to do with .
Now
Now , so we're left with the integral of the interpolating polynomial :
Computing the Error
So
Let , and
Then by the intermediate value theorem.
Let and , then
Therefore, the error is
Composite Rule
Suppose we apply Simpson's rule times (hence we need points) over a large interval . In other words, we take sub-intervals of that have equal length.
Where .
Simplifying the expression above gives
The error of this composite is given by
Hence