MATH 415 Lecture 7

From Notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

« previous | Tuesday, September 17, 2013 | next »


Additional Office Hours:

  • TR 13:15–14:00
  • After 17:00 by appointment
  • W 11:15–12:00


Section 10: Cosets and Lagrange's Theorem

Given , where is finite, .

Define two Equivalence relations: (left) and (right)

Theorem 10.1

Let .

  • Let iff
  • Let iff

Then and are equivalence relations

Proof. For

  • Reflexivity:
  • Symmetry: implies
  • Transitivity: and give .

For

  • Reflexivity:
  • Symmetry: implies
  • Transitivity: and give .
quod erat demonstrandum


Cosets

The defined relation means that if , then there exists a such that . Respectively, if , then there exists a such that . In shorthand, let and , then

  • is called a left coset of containing , and
  • is called a right coset of containing .

In general, . For abelian (commutative) groups, , so we will use for these groups.


Example 10.4

Take . If we have (or and ), then we can say that and are congruent modulo .

Cosents correspond to elements of . For example, when and , we get

  • coset containing 0 is
  • coset containing 1 is
  • coset containing 2 is

Take a look at the following addition table:

+6 0 3 1 4 2 5
0 0 3 1 4 2 5
3 3 0 4 1 5 2
1 1 4 2 5 3 0
4 4 1 5 2 0 3
2 2 5 3 0 4 1
5 5 2 0 3 1 4


Example 10.7

Take group , where each is a triangular rotation and each is a transposition. Note that , and note that is non-abelian. Let . Then

  • left coset containing is
  • left coset containing is
  • left coset containing is

Notice the differences between left and right cosets

  • right coset containing is
  • right coset containing is
  • right coset containing is


The Theorem of Lagrange

Let where is a finite group. Then the order of is a divisor of the order of :

Proof. Given a finite group . Let be the identity element, and let , , , … be cosets.

Observe that either or .

For all , we have .

Let be a function from to with . a bijection.

We have is a union of distinct subsets , where all orders are equal. Thus , so divides .

quod erat demonstrandum

We denote the number as the index of in .


Corollary. Every group of prime order is cyclic.

Suppose has prime order , and let be generator for . Then either or . The first case is impossbile because (namely, and must be elements). Thus , and its cyclic generator is . So must be cyclic.

quod erat demonstrandum

Given with and are finite, then is finite and .