« previous | Tuesday, September 17, 2013 | next »
Additional Office Hours:
- TR 13:15–14:00
- After 17:00 by appointment
- W 11:15–12:00
Section 10: Cosets and Lagrange's Theorem
Given , where is finite, .
Define two Equivalence relations: (left) and (right)
Theorem 10.1
Let .
- Let iff
- Let iff
Then and are equivalence relations
Proof. For
- Reflexivity:
- Symmetry: implies
- Transitivity: and give .
For
- Reflexivity:
- Symmetry: implies
- Transitivity: and give .
quod erat demonstrandum
Cosets
The defined relation means that if , then there exists a such that . Respectively, if , then there exists a such that . In shorthand, let and , then
- is called a left coset of containing , and
- is called a right coset of containing .
In general, . For abelian (commutative) groups, , so we will use for these groups.
Example 10.4
Take . If we have (or and ), then we can say that and are congruent modulo .
Cosents correspond to elements of . For example, when and , we get
- coset containing 0 is
- coset containing 1 is
- coset containing 2 is
Take a look at the following addition table:
+6 |
0 |
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
0
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
Example 10.7
Take group , where each is a triangular rotation and each is a transposition. Note that , and note that is non-abelian. Let . Then
- left coset containing is
- left coset containing is
- left coset containing is
Notice the differences between left and right cosets
- right coset containing is
- right coset containing is
- right coset containing is
The Theorem of Lagrange
Let where is a finite group. Then the order of is a divisor of the order of :
Proof. Given a finite group . Let be the identity element, and let , , , … be cosets.
Observe that either or .
For all , we have .
Let be a function from to with . a bijection.
We have is a union of distinct subsets , where all orders are equal. Thus , so divides .
quod erat demonstrandum
We denote the number as the index of in .
Corollary. Every group of prime order is cyclic.
Suppose has prime order , and let be generator for . Then either or . The first case is impossbile because (namely, and must be elements). Thus , and its cyclic generator is . So must be cyclic.
quod erat demonstrandum
Given with and are finite, then is finite and .