« previous | Tuesday, September 17, 2013 | next »
Additional Office Hours:
- TR 13:15–14:00
- After 17:00 by appointment
- W 11:15–12:00
Section 10: Cosets and Lagrange's Theorem
Given
, where
is finite,
.
Define two Equivalence relations:
(left) and
(right)
Theorem 10.1
Let
.
- Let
iff 
- Let
iff 
Then
and
are equivalence relations
Proof. For
- Reflexivity:

- Symmetry:
implies 
- Transitivity:
and
give
.
For
- Reflexivity:

- Symmetry:
implies 
- Transitivity:
and
give
.
quod erat demonstrandum
Cosets
The defined relation means that if
, then there exists a
such that
. Respectively, if
, then there exists a
such that
. In shorthand, let
and
, then
is called a left coset of
containing
, and
is called a right coset of
containing
.
In general,
. For abelian (commutative) groups,
, so we will use
for these groups.
Example 10.4
Take
. If we have
(or
and
), then we can say that
and
are congruent modulo
.
Cosents correspond to elements of
. For example, when
and
, we get
- coset containing 0 is

- coset containing 1 is

- coset containing 2 is

Take a look at the following addition table:
+6 |
0 |
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
0
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
Example 10.7
Take group
, where each
is a triangular rotation and each
is a transposition. Note that
, and note that
is non-abelian. Let
. Then
- left coset containing
is 
- left coset containing
is 
- left coset containing
is 
Notice the differences between left and right cosets
- right coset containing
is 
- right coset containing
is 
- right coset containing
is 
The Theorem of Lagrange
Let
where
is a finite group. Then the order of
is a divisor of the order of
:
Proof. Given a finite group
. Let
be the identity element, and let
,
,
, …
be cosets.
Observe that either
or
.
For all
, we have
.
Let
be a function from
to
with
.
a bijection.
We have
is a union of distinct subsets
, where all orders
are equal. Thus
, so
divides
.
quod erat demonstrandum
We denote the number
as the index of
in
.
Corollary. Every group of prime order is cyclic.
Suppose
has prime order
, and let
be generator for
. Then either
or
. The first case is impossbile because
(namely,
and
must be elements). Thus
, and its cyclic generator is
. So
must be cyclic.
quod erat demonstrandum
Given
with
and
are finite, then
is finite and
.