« previous | Tuesday, September 10, 2013 | next »
Review
Theorem 6.14
Let
be a cyclic group with
elements and generated by
. Let
and
. Then
generates a cyclic group of order
where
. Also
Proof. Let
be the order of
.
Recall that if
has order
and
, then
divides
.
From our definition of
above, we have
, so
Thus we have
, and
.
, so
divides
, and
for some
.
, so
divides
. . .
To prove the bi-implication, start with the first part: assume the order of
is equal to the order of
. Then
, and thus
.
Next, proving the converse; assume
. Then we have
. Furthermore, since in
there is only one subgroup of the given order, we have
.
quod erat demonstrandum
Corollary
If
is a generator of a finite cyclic group
of order
, then the generators of
are the elemonts of the form
, where
.
Proof.
if and only if
if and only if
is a generator.
quod erat demonstrandum
Exercise 6.17
Find all subgroups of
, and draw the subgroup diagram.
The following numbers are coprime with 18: 1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17. Therefore, they are all generators of
: so
The group generated by 2 is
. By the theorem above, this is equivalent to the groups generated by other numbers that only share only a common factor of 2 with 18: 4, 8, 10, 14, 16.
The group generated by 3 is
. In this case, the only number that shares only a common factor of 3 with 18 is 15.
Similarly,
.
And
.
Finally, the trivial subgroup containing only the identity element
.
Thus there are only 6 subgroups of this group. We arrange these groups on a subgroup diagram by which groups are included in which other groups:
Section 8: Groups of Permutations
Let
be a set. A function
which is bijective is called a permutation of
.
Composition of Permutations
If
and
are permutations on
, then
is also a permutation
Proof. If
, then
by injectivity of
, and thus
by injectivity of
.
Let
. Since
is onto, there exists a
such that
. Since
is onto, there exists a
such that
. Then
. Thus
is onto.
quod erat demonstrandum
Notation: Let
be a permutation. We denote it as a 2×1 matrix. For example,
What we mean by this is that 1 maps to 4, 2 maps to 2, 3 maps to 5, and so on.
Suppose we have another permutation
We can find
Inverse Permutations
It's possible to find
because
is bijective.
Let's find the inverse of
above:
Theorem 8.5
Let
be a non-empty set. Let
be the set of all permutations on
. Then
is a group under composition of permutations.
Note: We just showed above that composition is a binary operation. Now we will show that it can be used to define a group.
Proof. In order to show that
is a group, we need to show:
- Associativity (check; since composition of functions is always associative)
- Identity (check;
is the identity function, and
)
- Inversion (check;
for
, and
)
Example
Let
be a nonempty set of
elements.
is called the symmetric group on
letters
Note: If
and
have the same cardinality (i.e. there is a bijective function from
to
and vice versa), then
is isomorphic to any
.
Proof. We define
to be
, where
is a bijective function from
to
. The claim is that
is a group isomorphism.
Homomorphism:
Injectivity:
If
, then we have
for all elements of
. Since
is bijective, we can say
. Since
is bijective, we can say that
. Thus
is injective.
Surjectivity
Let
. Then
.
. Therefore
is surjective.