« previous | Tuesday, September 10, 2013 | next »
Review
Theorem 6.14
Let be a cyclic group with elements and generated by . Let and . Then generates a cyclic group of order where . Also
Proof. Let be the order of .
Recall that if has order and , then divides .
From our definition of above, we have , so
Thus we have , and .
, so divides , and for some .
, so divides . . .
To prove the bi-implication, start with the first part: assume the order of is equal to the order of . Then , and thus .
Next, proving the converse; assume . Then we have . Furthermore, since in there is only one subgroup of the given order, we have .
quod erat demonstrandum
Corollary
If is a generator of a finite cyclic group of order , then the generators of are the elemonts of the form , where .
Proof. if and only if if and only if is a generator.
quod erat demonstrandum
Exercise 6.17
Find all subgroups of , and draw the subgroup diagram.
The following numbers are coprime with 18: 1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17. Therefore, they are all generators of : so
The group generated by 2 is . By the theorem above, this is equivalent to the groups generated by other numbers that only share only a common factor of 2 with 18: 4, 8, 10, 14, 16.
The group generated by 3 is . In this case, the only number that shares only a common factor of 3 with 18 is 15.
Similarly, .
And .
Finally, the trivial subgroup containing only the identity element .
Thus there are only 6 subgroups of this group. We arrange these groups on a subgroup diagram by which groups are included in which other groups:
Section 8: Groups of Permutations
Let be a set. A function which is bijective is called a permutation of .
Composition of Permutations
If and are permutations on , then is also a permutation
Proof. If , then by injectivity of , and thus by injectivity of .
Let . Since is onto, there exists a such that . Since is onto, there exists a such that . Then . Thus is onto.
quod erat demonstrandum
Notation: Let be a permutation. We denote it as a 2×1 matrix. For example,
What we mean by this is that 1 maps to 4, 2 maps to 2, 3 maps to 5, and so on.
Suppose we have another permutation
We can find
Inverse Permutations
It's possible to find because is bijective.
Let's find the inverse of above:
Theorem 8.5
Let be a non-empty set. Let be the set of all permutations on . Then is a group under composition of permutations.
Note: We just showed above that composition is a binary operation. Now we will show that it can be used to define a group.
Proof. In order to show that is a group, we need to show:
- Associativity (check; since composition of functions is always associative)
- Identity (check; is the identity function, and )
- Inversion (check; for , and )
Example
Let be a nonempty set of elements.
is called the symmetric group on letters
Note: If and have the same cardinality (i.e. there is a bijective function from to and vice versa), then is isomorphic to any .
Proof. We define to be , where is a bijective function from to . The claim is that is a group isomorphism.
Homomorphism:
Injectivity:
If , then we have for all elements of . Since is bijective, we can say . Since is bijective, we can say that . Thus is injective.
Surjectivity
Let . Then . . Therefore is surjective.