« previous | Thursday, November 21, 2013 | next »
Group Rings and Group Fields
Consider group of two elements
and field
. We construct the group ring
.
The addition and multiplication tables are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Quaternions
This is a noncommutative division ring (skew field)
Discovered by Hamilton
Denoted
Addition
Addition defined as
"identity" elements:




For scalar multiplication (any
):




Thus any
can be written as the sum of components
.
Multiplication
- for any
, 
(idempotent)

Cyclic
, 
, 
, 
Think of moving CCW around triangle:
k
i j
Carefully expand the following product:
Conjugates
If
, the conjugate of
, denoted
is given by
Now
This also happens to be
, where
is the "length" or "norm" of
.
By the way,
if and only if
.
Observe
Theorem 24.9
The quaternions
form a strictly skew field under
,
.
Theorem 24.10: Wedderburn's Theorem
Every finite division ring is a field.
Group Action on a Set
Let
be a set and
be a group
Definition
An action of
on
is a map
such that

for all
and for all
(associativity)
The notation Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X}
means "
acts on
"
Alternatively, we say that
is a
-set.
Example
Consider
(symmetric group of size
) and
.
Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle S_n \lefttorightarrow X}
: Let
, then
Also consider the alternating group
consisting of even permutations. Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle A_n \lefttorightarrow X}
.
- In general, if Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X}
and
, then Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle H \lefttorightarrow X}
as well.
If
, then it happens that Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle S_X \lefttorightarrow X}
(even for infinite sets!)
Theorem 16.3
Let
be a
-set. Then for each
, the function
defined by
for
is a permutation of
.
Also, the map
defined by
is a homomorphism with the property that
In other words, we claim that
is a bijection:
- injectivity: suppose
for distinct elements
and
. Then
. Apply the inverse action to both sides, and we get
implies 
- surjectivity: ???
Properties
Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X}
is transitive if for all
, there existts a
such that
.
We define orbits of
(notation:
) as
In fact,
is a disjoint union of orbits.
Membership in an orbit imposes an equivalence relation on
: each orbit
represents the equivalence class
.
The action is transitive if and only if there is only one orbit.
Lazy Elements
We call an element "lazy" if
for all
. Let
denote the set of lazy elements. Then
.
In fact,
is the kernel of our action (
), in which case the kernel of a homomorphism is always a normal subgroup.
We say that the action Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X}
is faithful if
(i.e. if the identity element is the only lazy element.
If this is the case, our homomorphism
is injective and therefore an isomorphism on its image
.
Self-Actions
We can represent the action of a group on itself by left (or right) multiplication
Isotropy
Suppose Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X}
. Then for a particular element
, we define the isotropy subgroup (or stabilizer of
) as
Note: Do not confuse the isotropy subgroup with the lazy elements above!
Similarly, we can consider the elements
for which
for a particular
. The group
of such elements contains fixed points for
.
Theorem 16.16
We define
. Observe that Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle G \lefttoright O_x}
is a transitive relation (in fact it is an equivalence relation forming a single equivalence class).
Theorem.
- If
is a
-set and
, then
.
- If
, then
is a divisor of 
Proof. Let
and let
(set of cosets of H, or
.
We will show that
is a bijection:
injective. Let
. Then there is
such that
. Is
well-defined? Suppose there exists
such that
. By transitivity, we have
Therefore
and thus
.
surjective. For any
coset, we have
and
.
Therefore the order of the orbit
is identical to the order of the set of cosets, which is the same as the index:

If
, then
.
quod erat demonstrandum
If we have two orbits
and
, we claim that they are conjugate; that is, there exists an element
such that
:
Let
. Then
. Hence
.