MATH 415 Lecture 24

From Notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

« previous | Thursday, November 21, 2013 | next »


Group Rings and Group Fields

Consider group of two elements and field . We construct the group ring .

The addition and multiplication tables are:


The Quaternions

This is a noncommutative division ring (skew field)

Discovered by Hamilton

Denoted

Addition

Addition defined as

"identity" elements:

For scalar multiplication (any ):

Thus any can be written as the sum of components .

Multiplication

  • for any ,
  • (idempotent)

Cyclic

  • ,
  • ,
  • ,

Think of moving CCW around triangle:

  k

i   j

Carefully expand the following product:

Conjugates

If , the conjugate of , denoted is given by

Now

This also happens to be , where is the "length" or "norm" of .

By the way, if and only if .

Observe

Theorem 24.9

The quaternions form a strictly skew field under , .

Theorem 24.10: Wedderburn's Theorem

Every finite division ring is a field.


Group Action on a Set

Let be a set and be a group


Definition

An action of on is a map such that

  1. for all and for all (associativity)

The notation Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X} means " acts on "

Alternatively, we say that is a -set.

Example

Consider (symmetric group of size ) and .

Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle S_n \lefttorightarrow X} : Let , then

Also consider the alternating group consisting of even permutations. Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle A_n \lefttorightarrow X} .

  • In general, if Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X} and , then Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle H \lefttorightarrow X} as well.

If , then it happens that Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle S_X \lefttorightarrow X} (even for infinite sets!)


Theorem 16.3

Let be a -set. Then for each , the function defined by for is a permutation of .

Also, the map defined by is a homomorphism with the property that


In other words, we claim that is a bijection:

  1. injectivity: suppose for distinct elements and . Then . Apply the inverse action to both sides, and we get implies
  2. surjectivity: ???


Properties

Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X} is transitive if for all , there existts a such that .


We define orbits of (notation: ) as

In fact, is a disjoint union of orbits.

Membership in an orbit imposes an equivalence relation on : each orbit represents the equivalence class .

The action is transitive if and only if there is only one orbit.


Lazy Elements

We call an element "lazy" if for all . Let denote the set of lazy elements. Then .

In fact, is the kernel of our action (), in which case the kernel of a homomorphism is always a normal subgroup.

We say that the action Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X} is faithful if (i.e. if the identity element is the only lazy element.

If this is the case, our homomorphism is injective and therefore an isomorphism on its image .


Self-Actions

We can represent the action of a group on itself by left (or right) multiplication


Isotropy

Suppose Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X} . Then for a particular element , we define the isotropy subgroup (or stabilizer of ) as

Note: Do not confuse the isotropy subgroup with the lazy elements above!

Similarly, we can consider the elements for which for a particular . The group of such elements contains fixed points for .


Theorem 16.16

We define . Observe that Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttoright"): {\displaystyle G \lefttoright O_x} is a transitive relation (in fact it is an equivalence relation forming a single equivalence class).

Theorem.

  • If is a -set and , then .
  • If , then is a divisor of

Proof. Let and let (set of cosets of H, or .

We will show that is a bijection:

injective. Let . Then there is such that . Is well-defined? Suppose there exists such that . By transitivity, we have

Therefore and thus .

surjective. For any coset, we have and .


Therefore the order of the orbit is identical to the order of the set of cosets, which is the same as the index:

If , then .

quod erat demonstrandum


If we have two orbits and , we claim that they are conjugate; that is, there exists an element such that :

Let . Then . Hence .