« previous | Thursday, November 21, 2013 | next »
Group Rings and Group Fields
Consider group of two elements  and field
 and field  . We construct the group ring
. We construct the group ring  .
.
The addition and multiplication tables are:
|   |   |   |   |   | 
|   |   |   |   |   | 
|   |   |   |   |   | 
|   |   |   |   |   | 
|   |   |   |   |   | 
|   |   |   |   |   | 
|   |   |   |   |   | 
|   |   |   |   |   | 
|   |   |   |   |   | 
|   |   |   |   |   | 
The Quaternions
This is a noncommutative division ring (skew field)
Discovered by Hamilton
Denoted  
Addition
Addition defined as  
"identity" elements:
 
 
 
 
For scalar multiplication (any  ):
):
 
 
 
 
Thus any  can be written as the sum of components
 can be written as the sum of components  .
.
Multiplication
- for any  , , 
 (idempotent) (idempotent)
 
Cyclic
 , , 
 , , 
 , , 
Think of moving CCW around triangle:
  k
i   j
Carefully expand the following product:
 
Conjugates
If  , the conjugate of
, the conjugate of  , denoted
, denoted  is given by
 is given by  
Now  
This also happens to be  , where
, where  is the "length" or "norm" of
 is the "length" or "norm" of  .
.
By the way,  if and only if
 if and only if  .
.
Observe  
Theorem 24.9
The quaternions  form a strictly skew field under
 form a strictly skew field under  ,
,  .
.
Theorem 24.10: Wedderburn's Theorem
Every finite division ring is a field.
Group Action on a Set
Let  be a set and
 be a set and  be a group
 be a group
Definition
An action of  on
 on  is a map
 is a map  such that
 such that
 
 for all for all and for all and for all (associativity) (associativity)
The notation Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X}
 means " acts on
 acts on  "
"
Alternatively, we say that  is a
 is a  -set.
-set.
Example
Consider  (symmetric group of size
 (symmetric group of size  ) and
) and  .
.
Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle S_n \lefttorightarrow X}
: Let  , then
, then  
Also consider the alternating group  consisting of even permutations. Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle A_n \lefttorightarrow X}
.
 consisting of even permutations. Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle A_n \lefttorightarrow X}
.
- In general, if Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X}
 and  , then Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle H \lefttorightarrow X}
 as well. , then Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle H \lefttorightarrow X}
 as well.
If  , then it happens that Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle S_X \lefttorightarrow X}
 (even for infinite sets!)
, then it happens that Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle S_X \lefttorightarrow X}
 (even for infinite sets!)
Theorem 16.3
Let  be a
 be a  -set. Then for each
-set. Then for each  , the function
, the function  defined by
 defined by  for
 for  is a permutation of
 is a permutation of  .
.
Also, the map  defined by
 defined by  is a homomorphism with the property that
 is a homomorphism with the property that  
In other words, we claim that  is a bijection:
 is a bijection:
- injectivity: suppose  for distinct elements for distinct elements and and . Then . Then . Apply the inverse action to both sides, and we get . Apply the inverse action to both sides, and we get implies implies 
- surjectivity: ???
Properties
Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X}
 is transitive if for all  , there existts a
, there existts a  such that
 such that  .
.
We define orbits of  (notation:
 (notation:  ) as
) as
 
In fact,  is a disjoint union of orbits.
 is a disjoint union of orbits.
Membership in an orbit imposes an equivalence relation on  : each orbit
: each orbit  represents the equivalence class
 represents the equivalence class ![{\displaystyle \left[x\right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/bee30b48da3d61e9dfa898ca4d209afdcc6503dc) .
.
The action is transitive if and only if there is only one orbit.
Lazy Elements
We call an element "lazy" if  for all
 for all  . Let
. Let  denote the set of lazy elements. Then
 denote the set of lazy elements. Then  .
.
In fact,  is the kernel of our action (
 is the kernel of our action ( ), in which case the kernel of a homomorphism is always a normal subgroup.
), in which case the kernel of a homomorphism is always a normal subgroup.
We say that the action Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X}
 is faithful if  (i.e. if the identity element is the only lazy element.
 (i.e. if the identity element is the only lazy element.
If this is the case, our homomorphism  is injective and therefore an isomorphism on its image
 is injective and therefore an isomorphism on its image ![{\displaystyle \phi [G]\leq S_{X}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/e6173495f622b0ad9906108a466980e4fafa5955) .
.
Self-Actions
We can represent the action of a group on itself by left (or right) multiplication
Isotropy
Suppose Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttorightarrow"): {\displaystyle G \lefttorightarrow X}
. Then for a particular element  , we define the isotropy subgroup (or stabilizer of
, we define the isotropy subgroup (or stabilizer of  ) as
) as
 
 Note: Do not confuse the isotropy subgroup with the lazy elements above!
Similarly, we can consider the elements  for which
 for which  for a particular
 for a particular  . The group
. The group  of such elements contains fixed points for
 of such elements contains fixed points for  .
.
Theorem 16.16
We define  . Observe that Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttoright"): {\displaystyle G \lefttoright O_x}
 is a transitive relation (in fact it is an equivalence relation forming a single equivalence class).
. Observe that Failed to parse (unknown function "\lefttoright"): {\displaystyle G \lefttoright O_x}
 is a transitive relation (in fact it is an equivalence relation forming a single equivalence class).
Theorem.
- If  is a is a -set and -set and , then , then . .
- If  , then , then is a divisor of is a divisor of 
Proof. Let  and let
 and let  (set of cosets of H, or
 (set of cosets of H, or  .
.
We will show that  is a bijection:
 is a bijection:
injective. Let  . Then there is
. Then there is  such that
 such that  . Is
. Is  well-defined? Suppose there exists
 well-defined? Suppose there exists  such that
 such that  . By transitivity, we have
. By transitivity, we have
 
Therefore  and thus
 and thus  .
.
surjective. For any  coset, we have
 coset, we have  and
 and  .
.
Therefore the order of the orbit  is identical to the order of the set of cosets, which is the same as the index:
 is identical to the order of the set of cosets, which is the same as the index:

If  , then
, then  .
. 
quod erat demonstrandum
If we have two orbits  and
 and  , we claim that they are conjugate; that is, there exists an element
, we claim that they are conjugate; that is, there exists an element  such that
 such that  :
:
Let  . Then
. Then  . Hence
. Hence  .
.