MATH 409 Lecture 24

From Notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

« previous | Tuesday, November 26, 2013 | next »

Lecture Slides

Course evaluations up today on Math Dept. Home Page

Tests of Convergence

divergence test
If the terms of an infinite series do not converge to zero, then the series diverges
cauchy criterion
An infinite series n=1an converges if and only if for every ϵ>0, there exists N such that mnN implies |an+an+1++am|<ϵ
comparison test (series with nonnegative terms)
Suppose an,bn0 for all n and an<bn for large n. Then convergence of the series n=1bn implies convergence of n=1an while n=1an= implies n=1bn=
integral test
Suppose that a function f:[1,) is positive and decreasing on [1,) then the series n=1f(n) converges if and only if the function f is improperly integrable on [1,)

Alternating Series

An infinite series n=1an is called alternating if any two neighboring terms have different signs: anan+1<0 for all n.

Leibniz Criterion

Theorem. [Alternating Series Test]. [Leibniz Criterion]. If {an} is a decreasing sequence of positive numbers and an0 as n, then the following alternating series converges:

n=1(1)n+1an=a1a2+a3

Proof. Let sn=k=1n(1)k+1ak the the partial sum of order n of the series. For any n we have (odd terms are positive, even terms are negative)

s2n=s2n1a2n<s2n1

Since the sequence {an} is decreasing, we also have

s2n+1=s2n1a2n+a2n+1s2n1s2n+2=s2n+a2n+1a2n+2s2n

Therefore s2ns2n+2<s2n+1s2n1 for all n. It follows that a subsequence {s2n} is increasing, and a subsequence {s2n1} is decreasing, and both are bounded. Hence both subsequences are convergent. (but do they both converge to the same limit?)

Since s2n1s2n=a2n0 as n, both subsequences converge to the same limit L, then L is the limit of the entire sequence {sn}.

quod erat demonstrandum
Note: This theorem is not directly proved in the book. Rather it is a corollary of a more general theorem, Abel's Theorem, which is more complicated.


Examples

n=1(1)n+1n=112+13

This series converges due to the alternating series test.

One can show that the sum is log2 (this is a functional series in the form of a taylor series).

[Leibniz series]. n=1(1)n2n1=1+1315+17

After multiplying all terms by 1, the series satisfies all conditions of the alternating series test.

It follows that the series converges to π4 (this is also a functional series in the form of a fourier series)

n=1(1)n+1n2n1=123+3547+

This series diverges because even though the terms decrease in absolute value, they converge to 12, not 0


Absolute Convergence of Series

An infinite series n=1an is said to converge absolutely if n=1|an|<.

Theorem. Any absolutely convergent series is convergent.

Proof. Suppose that a series n=1an converges absolutely, that is, the series n=1|an| converges. By the Cauchy criterion, for every ϵ>0, there exists N such that

||an|+|an+1|++|am||<ϵ

for mnN. (The outer absolute values are redundant since all terms inside will be positive anyway)

Then |an+an+1++am||an|+|an+1|++|am|<ϵ (by the triangle inequality) for mnN. According to the Cauchy criterion, the series n=1an converges.

quod erat demonstrandum

Examples

n=11n3=1+123+133+

The series converges due to the integral test. Since it has positive terms, it is absolutely convergent as well.

n=1sinnn2=sin1+sin24+sin34+

This series converges since |sinnn2|1n2 converges absolutely by the comparison test.

n=1(1)n+1n=112+13

This series converges due to the alternating series test, but it is not absolutely convergent as the series n=11n diverges.


Other Tests

Ratio Test (d'Alembert's Criterion)

Theorem. Let {an} be a sequence of real numbers with an0 for large n. Suppose that the following limit exists (finite or infinite):

r=limn|an+1||an|
  1. If r<1, then n=1an converges absolutely
  2. If r>1, then n=1an diverges.
  3. If r=1, the test is inconclusive. (e.g. limn(n+1)pnp=1, but np converges for p>1 and diverges otherwise.)

Proof. If r>1, then |an+1||an|>1 for n large enough. It follows that the sequence {|an|} is eventually increasing. Then Failed to parse (unknown function "\nto"): {\displaystyle a_n \nto 0} as n so that the series n=1an diverges due to the divergence test.

In the case r<1, choose some x(r,1). Then |an+1||an|<x for n large enough. Consequently, |an+1|xn+1<|an|xn for n large enough. That is, the sequence {|an|xn} is eventually decreasing. It follows that this sequence is bounded. Hence |an|<Cxn for some C>0 and all n. Since 0<r<x<1, the geometric series n=1xn converges. So does the series n=1Cxn. By the comparison test, the series n=1|an| converges as well. The convergence of n=1an follows from absolute convergence.

quod erat demonstrandum


Root Test

Theorem. Let {an} be a sequence of real numbers and

r=lim supn|an|n
  1. If r<1, then n=1an converges absolutely
  2. If r>1, then n=1an diverges.

Proof. If r>1, then supkn|ak|kr>1 for all n. Therefore for any n, there exists k(n)n such that |ak(n)|1k(n)>1. In particular, |ak(n)|>1. It follows that Failed to parse (unknown function "\nto"): {\displaystyle a_k \nto 0} as k so that the series k=1ak diverges due to the divergence test.

In the case r<1, choose some x(r,1). Then supkn|ak|k<x for some n. This implies that |ak|<xk for all kn. Since 0<r<x<1, the geometric series k=1xk converges. By the comparison test, the series k=1|ak| converges as well. The convergence of n=1an follows from absolute convergence.

quod erat demonstrandum


Examples

n=1n2n=12+24+38+

If an=n2n, then limnan+1an=limnn+12n=12. The series converges by the ratio test.

n=0xnn!=1+x1!+x22!+x33!+, where x

In the case x=0, we have a finite sum. In the case x0, let an=xnn!, then limn|an+1||an|=|x|n+1=0. Therefore the series converges absolutely for all x0 by the ratio test.

n=1(n!)2(2n)!=(1!)22!+(2!)24!+(3!)26!+

If an=(n!)2(2n)!, then limnan+1an=1+n14+2n1=14. By the ratio test, the series converges.

n=1(nn+1)n2=12+(23)4+(34)9+

If an=(nn+1)n2, then limnann=limn(nn+1)n=limn(1+1n)n=1e. By the root test, the series converges.