MATH 409 Lecture 22

From Notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

« previous | Tuesday, November 19, 2013 | next »

Begin Exam 3 content
Lecture Slides

Improper Riemann Integrals

If a function f:[a,b] is integrable on [a,b], then the function F(x)=axf(t)dt is well-defined and continuous on [a,b]. In particular, F(c)F(b) as cb, that is,

abf(x)dx=limcb+acf(x)dx

Now suppose f is defined on the semi-open interval J=[a,b) and is integrable on any closed interval [c,d]J (such a function is called locally integrable on J). Then all integrals in the rgiht-hand side above are defined and the limit might exist even if f is not integrable on [a,b].

If this is the case, then f is called improperly integrable on J, and the limit is called the (improper) integral of f on [a,b).

Similar definition for (a,b]: take limit as ca+.


Precise Definition. A function f:(a,b) is called improperly integrable on the open interval (a,b) if for some (and then for any) c(a,b) it is improperly integrable on semi-open intervals (a,c] and [c,b). The integral of f is defined by

abf(x)dx=acf(x)dx+cbf(x)dx

Properties

Suppose a function f is locally integrable on a semi-open interval J=[a,b) or J=(a,b]. Then there are two possible obstructions for f to be integrable on [a,b]:

  1. the function f is not bounded on J as we approach the open endpoint,
  2. The interval J is not bounded: open endpoint might be infinity.


Since an improper Riemann integral is a limit of proper integrals, the properties of improper integrals are analogous to those of proper integrals (and derived using limit theorems).

Theorem. Let f:[a,b) be integrable on any closed interval [a1,b1][a,b). Given c(a,b), the function f is improperly integrable on [c,b) if and only if it is improperly integrable on [a,b). In the case of integrability,

abf(x)dx=acf(x)dx+cbf(x)dx

Sketch of proof. Choos d(c,b). We have the following equality involving proper Riemann integrals:

adf(x)dx=acf(x)dx+cdf(x)dx

The theorem is proved by taking the limit as db.

quod erat demonstrandum


Theorem. Suppose that a function f:(a,b) is integrable on any closed interval [c,d](a,b). Given a number I, the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. for some c(a,b), the function f is improperly integrable on (a,c] and [c,b) and acf(x)dx+cbf(x)dx=I
  2. for every c(a,b), the function f is improperly integrable on (a,c] and [c,b) and acf(x)dx+cbf(x)dx=I
  3. for every c(a,b), the function f is improperly integrable on (a,c] and acf(x)dxI as cb
  4. for every c(a,b), the function f is improperly integrable on [c,b) and cbf(x)dxI as ca+

In view of the previous theorem, the integral does not depend on c. It can also be computed as a repeated limit:

abf(x)dx=limdb(limca+cdf(x)dx)=limca+(limdbcdf(x)dx)

Finally, the integral can be computed as a double limit (i.e., the limit of a function of two variables):

abf(x)dx=limca+dbcdf(x)dx


If a function f is integrable on a closed interval [a,b] or improperly integrable on one of the semi-open intervals [a,b) and (a,b], then it is also improperly integrable on the open interval (a,b) with the same value of the integral.


If functions f,g are improperly integrable on (a,b), then for any α,β, the linear combination αf+βg is also improperly integrable on (a,b) and

ab(αf(x)+βg(x))dx=αabf(x)dx+βabg(x)dx


Suppose a function f:(a,b) is locally integrable and has an antiderivative F. Then f is improperly integrable on (a,b) if and only if F(x) has finite limits as xa+ and as xb, in which case

abf(x)dx=limxbF(x)limxa+F(x)


Comparison Theorems for Improper Integrals

Theorem 1. Suppose that functions f,g are improperly integrable on (a,b). If f(x)g(x) for all x(a,b), then

abf(x)dxabf(x)dx


Theorem 2. Suppose that functions f,g are locally integrable on (a,b). If the function g is improperly integrable on (a,b) and 0f(x)g(x) for all x(a,b), then f is also improperly integrable on (a,b).

Note: This is the first theorem in which we can prove integrability of a function without actually computing its integral or taking an antiderivative. (not all functions have antiderivatives, but are still integrable)


Theorem 3. Suppose that functions f,g,h are locally integrable on (a,b). If the functions g,h are improperly integrable on (a,b) and h(x)f(x)g(x) for all x(a,b), then f is also improperly integrable on (a,b) and

abh(x)dxabf(x)dxabg(x)dx
Note: This theorem is derived from theorems 1 and 2. Also, h and g need not be identical.


Examples

1x is improperly integrable on (0,1].

011xdx=limc0+c11xdx=limc0+2x|x=c1=limc0+(22c)=2

x2 is improperly integrable on [1,).

1=limc+1cx2dx=limc+x1|x=1c=limc+(1c1)=1

f(x)=x2 is not improperly integrable on (0,).

Indeed the antiderivative of f is F(x)=x1, which has a finite limit as x, but diverges to infinity as x0+.

g(x)=x2cosx is improperly integrable on [1,).

This function has no nice antiderivative. Instead, we shall use the "squeeze theorem" for improper integrals. We have f(x)g(x)f(x)=x2 for all x1 (f is from the previous example). Since f is improperly integrable on [1,), it follows that f is also improperly integrable on [1,). By the Comparison Theorem for improper integrals, the function g is improperly integrable on [1,) as well.

f(x)=ex is improperly integrable on [0,).

Indeed, the antiderivative of the function is ex, which has a finite limit as x+.

g(x)=ex2 is improperly integrable on (,).

Similar to above, there is no nice antiderivative of this function, but this formula shows up all the time in statistics.

We have 0g(x)f(x)=ex for all x1. Since f is improperly integrable on [0,), it follows that g is improperly integrable on [1,). Since g is even, g(x)=g(x), it follows that g is also improperly integrable on (,1]. Finally, g is properly integrable on [1,1].

f(x)=x1sinx is improperly integrable on [1,).

In the cosx example above, we used the comparison theorem. This will not work here because the antiderivative of x1 is lnx, which has no limit as x. To show improper integrability, we integrate by parts:

1cx1cosxdx=1cx1d(cosx)=x1cosx|x=1c+1ccosxd(x1)=cos1c1cosc1cx2cosxdx

Since the function g(x)=x2cosx is improperly integrable on [1,) and c1cosc0 as c, it follows that f is improperly integrable on [1,).


Absolute Integrability

Definition. A funciton f:(a,b) is called absolutely integrable on (a,b) if f is locally integrable on (a,b) and |f| is improperly integrable on (a,b).

Theorem. If a function f is absolutely integrable on (a,b), then it is also improperly integrable on (a,b) and

|abf(x)dx|ab|f(x)|dx

Proof. Since |f| is improperly integrable on (a,b), so is |f|. Clearly, |f(x)|f(x)|f(x)| for all x(a,b). By the Comparison Theorems for improper integrals, the function f is improperly integrable on (a,b) and

ab|f(x)|dxabf(x)dxab|f(x)|dx
quod erat demonstrandum


Examples

For any nonnegataive function, the absolute integrability is equivalent to improper integrability.

In particular,

  • The function f1(x)=x2 is absolutely integrable on [1,) and is not on (0,).
  • The function f2=1x is absolutely integrable on (0,1).
  • The function f3(x)=ex2 is absolutely integrable on (,)

The function f(x)=ex2sinx is absolutely integrable on (,)

Indeed, the function f is locally integrable on (,), a function g(x)=ex2 is improperly integrable on (,), and |f(x)|g(x) for all x

Counterexamples

The function f(x)={1x1x is not absolutely integrable on (0,1):

Indeed, the function f is not locally integrable on (0,1). At the same time, the function |f| is constant and hence (properly) integrable on (0,1).

f(x)=x1sinx is not absolutely integrable on [1,).

For any n,

nπ(n+1)π|f(x)|dxnπ(n+1)π|sinx|(n+1)πdx=1(n+1)π0πsinxdx=2(n+1)π1nπ1πnπ(n+1)π1xdx

It remains to notice that g(x)=1x is not improperly integrable on [π,).

Main idea: The function f behaves similarly to x1, so the improper integral on [1,) does not exist.