MATH 409 Lecture 22

From Notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

« previous | Tuesday, November 19, 2013 | next »

Begin Exam 3 content
Lecture Slides

Improper Riemann Integrals

If a function is integrable on , then the function is well-defined and continuous on . In particular, as , that is,

Now suppose is defined on the semi-open interval and is integrable on any closed interval (such a function is called locally integrable on ). Then all integrals in the rgiht-hand side above are defined and the limit might exist even if is not integrable on .

If this is the case, then is called improperly integrable on , and the limit is called the (improper) integral of on .

Similar definition for : take limit as .


Precise Definition. A function is called improperly integrable on the open interval if for some (and then for any) it is improperly integrable on semi-open intervals and . The integral of is defined by

Properties

Suppose a function is locally integrable on a semi-open interval or . Then there are two possible obstructions for to be integrable on :

  1. the function is not bounded on as we approach the open endpoint,
  2. The interval is not bounded: open endpoint might be infinity.


Since an improper Riemann integral is a limit of proper integrals, the properties of improper integrals are analogous to those of proper integrals (and derived using limit theorems).

Theorem. Let be integrable on any closed interval . Given , the function is improperly integrable on if and only if it is improperly integrable on . In the case of integrability,

Sketch of proof. Choos . We have the following equality involving proper Riemann integrals:

The theorem is proved by taking the limit as .

quod erat demonstrandum


Theorem. Suppose that a function is integrable on any closed interval . Given a number , the following conditions are equivalent:

  1. for some , the function is improperly integrable on and and
  2. for every , the function is improperly integrable on and and
  3. for every , the function is improperly integrable on and as
  4. for every , the function is improperly integrable on and as

In view of the previous theorem, the integral does not depend on . It can also be computed as a repeated limit:

Finally, the integral can be computed as a double limit (i.e., the limit of a function of two variables):


If a function is integrable on a closed interval or improperly integrable on one of the semi-open intervals and , then it is also improperly integrable on the open interval with the same value of the integral.


If functions are improperly integrable on , then for any , the linear combination is also improperly integrable on and


Suppose a function is locally integrable and has an antiderivative . Then is improperly integrable on if and only if has finite limits as and as , in which case


Comparison Theorems for Improper Integrals

Theorem 1. Suppose that functions are improperly integrable on . If for all , then


Theorem 2. Suppose that functions are locally integrable on . If the function is improperly integrable on and for all , then is also improperly integrable on .

Note: This is the first theorem in which we can prove integrability of a function without actually computing its integral or taking an antiderivative. (not all functions have antiderivatives, but are still integrable)


Theorem 3. Suppose that functions are locally integrable on . If the functions are improperly integrable on and for all , then is also improperly integrable on and

Note: This theorem is derived from theorems 1 and 2. Also, and need not be identical.


Examples

is improperly integrable on .

is improperly integrable on .

is not improperly integrable on .

Indeed the antiderivative of is , which has a finite limit as , but diverges to infinity as .

is improperly integrable on .

This function has no nice antiderivative. Instead, we shall use the "squeeze theorem" for improper integrals. We have for all ( is from the previous example). Since is improperly integrable on , it follows that is also improperly integrable on . By the Comparison Theorem for improper integrals, the function is improperly integrable on as well.

is improperly integrable on .

Indeed, the antiderivative of the function is , which has a finite limit as .

is improperly integrable on .

Similar to above, there is no nice antiderivative of this function, but this formula shows up all the time in statistics.

We have for all . Since is improperly integrable on , it follows that is improperly integrable on . Since is even, , it follows that is also improperly integrable on . Finally, is properly integrable on .

is improperly integrable on .

In the example above, we used the comparison theorem. This will not work here because the antiderivative of is , which has no limit as . To show improper integrability, we integrate by parts:

Since the function is improperly integrable on and as , it follows that is improperly integrable on .


Absolute Integrability

Definition. A funciton is called absolutely integrable on if is locally integrable on and is improperly integrable on .

Theorem. If a function is absolutely integrable on , then it is also improperly integrable on and

Proof. Since is improperly integrable on , so is . Clearly, for all . By the Comparison Theorems for improper integrals, the function is improperly integrable on and

quod erat demonstrandum


Examples

For any nonnegataive function, the absolute integrability is equivalent to improper integrability.

In particular,

  • The function is absolutely integrable on and is not on .
  • The function is absolutely integrable on .
  • The function is absolutely integrable on

The function is absolutely integrable on

Indeed, the function is locally integrable on , a function is improperly integrable on , and for all

Counterexamples

The function is not absolutely integrable on :

Indeed, the function is not locally integrable on . At the same time, the function is constant and hence (properly) integrable on .

is not absolutely integrable on .

For any ,

It remains to notice that is not improperly integrable on .

Main idea: The function behaves similarly to , so the improper integral on does not exist.