MATH 409 Lecture 22
« previous | Tuesday, November 19, 2013 | next »
Improper Riemann Integrals
If a function is integrable on , then the function is well-defined and continuous on . In particular, as , that is,
Now suppose is defined on the semi-open interval and is integrable on any closed interval (such a function is called locally integrable on ). Then all integrals in the rgiht-hand side above are defined and the limit might exist even if is not integrable on .
If this is the case, then is called improperly integrable on , and the limit is called the (improper) integral of on .
Similar definition for : take limit as .
Precise Definition. A function is called improperly integrable on the open interval if for some (and then for any) it is improperly integrable on semi-open intervals and . The integral of is defined by
Properties
Suppose a function is locally integrable on a semi-open interval or . Then there are two possible obstructions for to be integrable on :
- the function is not bounded on as we approach the open endpoint,
- The interval is not bounded: open endpoint might be infinity.
Since an improper Riemann integral is a limit of proper integrals, the properties of improper integrals are analogous to those of proper integrals (and derived using limit theorems).
Theorem. Let be integrable on any closed interval . Given , the function is improperly integrable on if and only if it is improperly integrable on . In the case of integrability,
Sketch of proof. Choos . We have the following equality involving proper Riemann integrals:
The theorem is proved by taking the limit as .
Theorem. Suppose that a function is integrable on any closed interval . Given a number , the following conditions are equivalent:
- for some , the function is improperly integrable on and and
- for every , the function is improperly integrable on and and
- for every , the function is improperly integrable on and as
- for every , the function is improperly integrable on and as
In view of the previous theorem, the integral does not depend on . It can also be computed as a repeated limit:
Finally, the integral can be computed as a double limit (i.e., the limit of a function of two variables):
If a function is integrable on a closed interval or improperly integrable on one of the semi-open intervals and , then it is also improperly integrable on the open interval with the same value of the integral.
If functions are improperly integrable on , then for any , the linear combination is also improperly integrable on and
Suppose a function is locally integrable and has an antiderivative . Then is improperly integrable on if and only if has finite limits as and as , in which case
Comparison Theorems for Improper Integrals
Theorem 1. Suppose that functions are improperly integrable on . If for all , then
Theorem 2. Suppose that functions are locally integrable on . If the function is improperly integrable on and for all , then is also improperly integrable on .
Theorem 3. Suppose that functions are locally integrable on . If the functions are improperly integrable on and for all , then is also improperly integrable on and
Examples
is improperly integrable on .
is improperly integrable on .
is not improperly integrable on .
Indeed the antiderivative of is , which has a finite limit as , but diverges to infinity as .
is improperly integrable on .
This function has no nice antiderivative. Instead, we shall use the "squeeze theorem" for improper integrals. We have for all ( is from the previous example). Since is improperly integrable on , it follows that is also improperly integrable on . By the Comparison Theorem for improper integrals, the function is improperly integrable on as well.
is improperly integrable on .
Indeed, the antiderivative of the function is , which has a finite limit as .
is improperly integrable on .
Similar to above, there is no nice antiderivative of this function, but this formula shows up all the time in statistics.
We have for all . Since is improperly integrable on , it follows that is improperly integrable on . Since is even, , it follows that is also improperly integrable on . Finally, is properly integrable on .
is improperly integrable on .
In the example above, we used the comparison theorem. This will not work here because the antiderivative of is , which has no limit as . To show improper integrability, we integrate by parts:
Since the function is improperly integrable on and as , it follows that is improperly integrable on .
Absolute Integrability
Definition. A funciton is called absolutely integrable on if is locally integrable on and is improperly integrable on .
Theorem. If a function is absolutely integrable on , then it is also improperly integrable on and
Proof. Since is improperly integrable on , so is . Clearly, for all . By the Comparison Theorems for improper integrals, the function is improperly integrable on and
Examples
For any nonnegataive function, the absolute integrability is equivalent to improper integrability.
In particular,
- The function is absolutely integrable on and is not on .
- The function is absolutely integrable on .
- The function is absolutely integrable on
The function is absolutely integrable on
Indeed, the function is locally integrable on , a function is improperly integrable on , and for all
Counterexamples
The function is not absolutely integrable on :
Indeed, the function is not locally integrable on . At the same time, the function is constant and hence (properly) integrable on .
is not absolutely integrable on .
For any ,
It remains to notice that is not improperly integrable on .
Main idea: The function behaves similarly to , so the improper integral on does not exist.