« previous | Thursday, November 7, 2013 | next »
Exam next Thursday
Homework problems just require definition of improper Riemann definition; look at hint for problem 5.3.12
Integral with Variable Limit
(See Integral with a variable limit→)
Proof. For any such that , we have
Then
So that
Dividing both sides by gives
If the function is right continuous at (i.e. as ), then as . It follows that is the right-hand derivative of at . Likewise, one can prove that left continuity of f at x implies is the left derivative at .
quod erat demonstrandum
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Theorem. [Part I]. If a function is continuous on an interval , then the function
is continuously differentiable on . Moreover, for all .
Proof. Since is continuous, it is also integrable on . As proved earlier, integrability of implies that the function is well-defined on . Moreover, whenever is continuous at the point . Therefore, the continuoity of on implies that for all . In particular, is continuously differentiable on .
quod erat demonstrandum
Proof. The case is trivial: . Assume . Since is integrable on , it is also integrable on any subinterval , . Therefore, it is no loss to assume that .
Consider an arbitrary partition of . Let us choose samples for the Riemann sum so that (this is possible due to the Mean Value Theorem). Then
Since the sums converge to as , the theorem follows: .
quod erat demonstrandum
The Indefinite Integral
Given a function , a function is called the indefinite integral (or antiderivative, primitive integral, or the primitive) of if for all . Notation:
If the function is continuous on , then the function for is an indefinite integral of due to the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
Suppose is an antiderivative of . If is another antiderivative of , then on . Hence on . It follows that is a constant function. Conversely, for any constant , the function is also an antiderivative of .
Where is an arbitrary constant.
Examples
- on for .
- on .
Integration by Parts
Theorem. Suppose that functions and are differentiable on with derivatives and integrable on . Then
Proof. By the product rule, on . Since are integrable on by the hypothesis, so are the products and . Then is integrable on as well. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus,
quod erat demonstrandum
Corollary. Suppose that functions are continuously differentiable on . Then
on
To simplify notation, it is convenient to use the Leibniz differential of a function defined by . Another convenient notation is or simply , which denotes the difference .
Now the formula of integration by parts can be rewritten as
for definite integrals, and as
for indefinite integrals
Examples
- .
Change of the variable in an integral
(commonly called u-substitution as is often replaced by in practice.)
Theorem. if is continuously differentiable on a closed, nondegenerate interval and is continuous on , then
Be aware that is a proper change of variable only if the function is strictly monotone. However, the theorem holds even without this assumption.
Proof. Let us define two functions
It follows from the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus that and . By the Chain Rule, .
Therefore, for all . It follows that the function is constant on . In particular, . Hence .
quod erat demonstrandum
Note: It is possible that . To make sense of this case, we set
if . Also we set the integral to be 0 if .