« previous | Thursday, November 7, 2013 | next »
Exam next Thursday
Homework problems just require definition of improper Riemann definition; look at hint for problem 5.3.12
Integral with Variable Limit
(See Integral with a variable limit→)
Proof. For any
such that
, we have
Then
So that
Dividing both sides by
gives
If the function
is right continuous at
(i.e.
as
), then
as
. It follows that
is the right-hand derivative of
at
. Likewise, one can prove that left continuity of f at x implies
is the left derivative at
.
quod erat demonstrandum
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Theorem. [Part I]. If a function
is continuous on an interval
, then the function
is continuously differentiable on
. Moreover,
for all
.
Proof. Since
is continuous, it is also integrable on
. As proved earlier, integrability of
implies that the function
is well-defined on
. Moreover,
whenever
is continuous at the point
. Therefore, the continuoity of
on
implies that
for all
. In particular,
is continuously differentiable on
.
quod erat demonstrandum
Proof. The case
is trivial:
. Assume
. Since
is integrable on
, it is also integrable on any subinterval
,
. Therefore, it is no loss to assume that
.
Consider an arbitrary partition
of
. Let us choose samples
for the Riemann sum
so that
(this is possible due to the Mean Value Theorem). Then
Since the sums
converge to
as
, the theorem follows:
.
quod erat demonstrandum
The Indefinite Integral
Given a function
, a function
is called the indefinite integral (or antiderivative, primitive integral, or the primitive) of
if
for all
. Notation:
If the function
is continuous on
, then the function
for
is an indefinite integral of
due to the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
Suppose
is an antiderivative of
. If
is another antiderivative of
, then
on
. Hence
on
. It follows that
is a constant function. Conversely, for any constant
, the function
is also an antiderivative of
.
Where
is an arbitrary constant.
Examples
on
for
.
on
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eee81/eee8130b42a2309b219c9ccf35bda0d54da678ea" alt="{\displaystyle \int \sin {x}=-\cos {x}+C}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35243/352433fb5b641a1b1b9496d07b9170b533763ab0" alt="{\displaystyle \int \cos {x}=\sin {x}+C}"
Integration by Parts
Theorem. Suppose that functions
and
are differentiable on
with derivatives
and
integrable on
. Then
Proof. By the product rule,
on
. Since
are integrable on
by the hypothesis, so are the products
and
. Then
is integrable on
as well. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus,
quod erat demonstrandum
Corollary. Suppose that functions
are continuously differentiable on
. Then
on
To simplify notation, it is convenient to use the Leibniz differential
of a function
defined by
. Another convenient notation is
or simply
, which denotes the difference
.
Now the formula of integration by parts can be rewritten as
for definite integrals, and as
for indefinite integrals
Examples
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75221/752214bebf98355a31b0bcfb1f78d3dda3bd04d3" alt="{\displaystyle \int \log {x}\,\mathrm {d} x=x\,\log {x}-\int x\,\mathrm {d} (\log {x})=x\,\log {x}-\int \mathrm {d} x=x\,\log {x}-x+C}"
.
Change of the variable in an integral
(commonly called u-substitution as
is often replaced by
in practice.)
Theorem. if
is continuously differentiable on a closed, nondegenerate interval
and
is continuous on
, then
Be aware that
is a proper change of variable only if the function
is strictly monotone. However, the theorem holds even without this assumption.
Proof. Let us define two functions
It follows from the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus that
and
. By the Chain Rule,
.
Therefore,
for all
. It follows that the function
is constant on
. In particular,
. Hence
.
quod erat demonstrandum
Note: It is possible that
. To make sense of this case, we set
if
. Also we set the integral to be 0 if
.