MATH 409 Lecture 13

From Notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

« previous | Thursday, October 10, 2013 | next »

End Exam 1 content
Lecture Slides


Review for Test

Part 1: Chapter 1 and Appendix A

  • Axioms of an ordered field
    • is an ordered fields
  • Completeness axiom
  • Archimedean principle
  • Principle of Mathematical Induction
  • Binomial Formula (as application of induction)
  • Countable and Uncountable sets.

Part 2: Chapters 2.1–2.5 and 3.1–3.4

  • Limits of sequences
  • Limit theorems for sequences
  • Monotone sequences
  • Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem
  • Cauchy Sequences (i.e. convergent sequences)
  • Limits of functions (one-sided, two-sided; at point, at infinity)
  • Limit Theorems for functions (analogous to theorems for sequences)
  • Continuity of Functions
  • Extreme value and Intermediate Value theorems
  • Uniform Continuity.

Axioms of Real Numbers

3 Postulates:

  1. is a field (+ and · defined with certain properties)
  2. There is a strict linear order < on that makes it into an ordered field
  3. (Completeness Axiom) If a nonenmpty subset E is bounded above, then E has a supremem. Conversely, if E is bounded below, then E has an infimum.

Theorems to Know

(will need to prove one)

Archimedian Principle. For any real number ϵ>0 , there exists a natural number n such that nϵ>1.

Principle of Mathematical Induction. Let P(n) be an assertion depending on a natural variable n. Suppose that

  • P(1) holds, and
  • Whenever P(k) holds, so does P(k+1)

Then P(n) holds for all n.

Theorem. If A1, A2, ... are finite or countable sets, then the union is also finite or countable. As a consequence, , , and × are countable.

Theorem. is uncountable.

Limit Theorems for Sequences

  1. Squeeze Theorem. For a sequence {yn}, if limnxn=limnzn=a, and xnyngn for nN0, then limnyn=a
  2. Comparison Theorem. if {xn} and {yn} are convergent sequences, and there exists N0 such that xnyn for all nN0, then limnxnlimnyn
  3. Arithmetic Operations Theorems. Limit of sum/difference is sum/difference of limits; Limit of product/quotient (for nonzero denominator) is product/quotient of limits

Monotone Convergence Theorem. Any monotone sequence converges to a limit if bounded, and diverges to infinity otherwise.

Bolzano-Weierstrass. Every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence.

Cauchy Sequences. Any Cauchy sequence is convergent.

Limit Theorems for Functions

Sequential Characterization of Continuity. f:E is continuous at cE if and only if for any sequence {xn} of elements of E, xnc as n implies f(xn)f(c) as n.

Arithmetic Operations Theorems. (analogous to above)

Extreme Value Theorem. If I=[a,b] is a closed, bounded interval, then any continuous function f:I is bounded and attains its max and min within I.

Intermediate Value Theorem.

Theorem. Any function continuous on a closed bounded interval [a,b] is also uniformly continuous on [a,b]


Sample Test

Problem 1

15 pts.

Prove that for any n,

13+23+33++n3=n2(n+1)24

Application of principle of mathematical induction

Proof. Let n=1, then 1=1. Assume that k=1nk3=n2(n+1)4 holds for some n. Add (k+1)3 to both sides, and

k=1n+1k3=k2(k+1)24+(k+1)3=(k+1)2k2+4(k+1)4=(k+1)2(k+2)24

quod erat demonstrandum

Note, we have just proved that k=0nk3=n2(n+1)24. It is also known that k=0nk=n(n+1)2. Therefore k=0nk3=(k=1nk)2 for all n.


Problem 2

30 pts.

Let {Fn} be the sequence of Fibonacci numbers F1=F2=1 and Fn=Fn1+Fn2 for n2.

  1. Show that {F2kF2k1}k is increasing while {F2k+1F2k}k is decreasing.
  2. Prove that limnFn+1Fn=5+12.

Proof of 1. Let xn=Fn+1Fn for n. Then

xn+1=Fn+2Fn+1=Fn+Fn+1Fx+1=1+1xn

for all n. In particular, x1=1, x2=1+1x1=2, and x3=1+1x2=32, and x4=1+1x3=53. Notice that

x1<x3<x4<x2

The function f(x)=1+1x is strictly decreasing on the interval (0,) and maps it to itself. Therefore its second iteration g=ff is strictly increasing on I and g(I)I (a decreasing function reverses the order of , so applying a decreasing function to a decreasing function once again reverses the order to be increasing). We have xn+2=f(xn+1)=f(f(xn))=g(xn) for n. Now it follows by induction on k that

x2k1<x2k+1<x2k+2<x2k for all k

(apply g to all elements of the inequality for the inductive step).

The proposition holds by transitivity and comparison theorem.

quod erat demonstrandum


Proof of 2. We already know that xn=Fn+1Fn satisfy inequalities

x2k1<x2k+1<x2k+2<x2k for all k

It follows that {x2k1} is strictly increasing, {x2k} is strictly decreasing, and both sequences are bounded. Therefore, these sequences are converging to some positive limits: x2k1c1 and x2kc2 as k. To prove that limnFn+1Fn=5+12, it is enough to show that c1=c2=5+12.

For any x>0 we obtain

g(x)=f(f(x))=f(1+1x)=1+11+1x=1+1x+1x=1+xx+1=2x+1x+1

It follows that g(x2k1)g(c1) and g(x2k)g(c2) as k. However, g(x2k1=x2k+1 and g(x2k)=x2k+2, which implies that g(c1)=c1 and g(c2)=c2. Since


xg(x)=x(x+1)x+12x+1x+1=x2x1x+1

Therefore c1 and c2 are roots of the equation x2x1=0. There are two roots because the constant is negative. Moreover, both roots must be of different signs (leading coefficient is positive, and constant is negative). This equation has two roots, 1±52. One of the roots is negative, so c1 and c2 are equal to the other root, 5+12.

quod erat demonstrandum

Problem 3

Prove the extreme value theorem: If f:[a,b] is a continuous function on a closed bounded interval [a,b], then f is bounded and attains its extreme values on [a,b].

Proof. First let us prove that f is bounded. Assume the contrary. Then for every n, there exists a point xn[a,b] such that |f(xn)|>n. We obtain a sequence {xn}.

...

Since f is bounded, the image f([a,b]) is a bounded subset of . Let m=inff([a,b]), and M=supf([a,b]). For any n, the number M1n is not an upper bound of f([a,b]) and m+1n is not a lower bound of f([a,b]). Hence we can find points yn,zn[a,b] such that f(yn)>M1n and f(zn)<m+1n. At the same time, mf(x)M...

...

quod erat demonstrandum

Problem 4

20 pts.

Consider f: defined by

f(1)=f(0)=f(1)=0 and f(x)=x1x21sin(1x) for x{1,0,1}.

  1. determine all points at which the function f is continuous.
  2. Is the function f uniformly continuous on the interval (0,1)? is it uniformly continuous on the interval (0,2)?

Proof of 1. The polynomial functions g1(x)=x1 and g2(x)=x21 are continuous on the entire real line. Moreover, g2(x)=0 if and only if x=±1. Therefore the quotient g(x)=g1(x)g2(x) is well-defined and continuous on {1,1}.

Further, the function h1(x)=1x is continuous on {0}. Since sinx is continuous on , the composite function h(x)=h2(h1(x)) is continuous on {0}.

Clearly f(x)=g(x)h(x) for all x{1,0,1}. It follows that f is continuous on that range as well.

It remains to determine whether the function f is continuous at points 1, 0, and 1. Observe that g(x)=1x+1 for all x{1,1}. Therefore g(x)1 as x0, g(x)12 as x1, and g(x)± as x1.

Since the function h is continuous at 1 and 1, we have h(x)1=sin1 as x1 and h(x)h(1)=sin1 as x1. Note that sin10 since 0<1<π2. It follows that f(x)± as x1. In particular f is discontinuous at 1.

Further, f(x)12sin1 as x1. Since f(1)=0, the function f has a removable discontinuity at 1.

All that remains is continuity at 0. Finally, f is not continuous at 0 since it has no limit at 0. To be precise, let xn=(π2+2πn)1 and yn=(π2+2πn)1 for all n. Then {xn} and {yn} are two convergent sequences of positive numbers converging to 0. We have h(xn)=1 and h(yn)=1 for all n. It follows that f(xn)1 and f(yn)1 as n. Hence there is no limit of f as x0+.

quod erat demonstrandum


Proof of 2. Any function uniformly continuous on the open interval (0,1) can be extended to a continuous function on [0,1]. As a consequence, such a function has a right-hand limit at 0. However, we already know that f has no right-hand limit at 0. Therefore f is not uniformly continuous on (0,1) (due to oscillation to the right of 0)

The function f is continuous at (1,2] and has a removable singularity at 1. Changing the value of f at 1 to the limit at 1, we obtain a function continuous on [1,2]. It is known that every function continuous on the closed interval [1,2] is also uniformly continuous on [1,2]. Further, any function uniformly continuous on the set [1,2] is also uniformly continuous on its subset (1,2). Since the redefined function coincides with f on (1,2), we conclude that f is uniformly continuous on (1,2)

The function f is continuous at (1,2] and has a removable singularity at 1. Changing the value of f at 1 to the limit at 1, we obtain a function continuous on [1,2]. It is known that every function continuous on the closed interval [1,2] is also uniformly continuous on [1,2]. Further, any function uniformly continuous on the set [1,2] is also uniformly continuous on its subset (1,2). Since the redefined function coincides with f on (1,2), we conclude that f is uniformly continuous on (1,2).

quod erat demonstrandum

Bonus Problem 5

Given a set X, let 𝒫(X) denote the set of all subsets of X. Prove that 𝒫(X) is not of the same cardinality as X.

(paradox: is set of all sets countable? Well, introduce concept of class)