MATH 323 Theorems

From Notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

MATH 323 Theorems

Chapter 1

Theorem 1.3.2

For all α,β∈ℝ and for all A,B,C, the indicated operations are defined:

  1. A+B=B+A (commutativity of addition)
  2. (A+B)+C=A+(B+C) (associativity of addition)
  3. (AB)C=A(BC) (associativity of multiplication)
  4. A(B+C)=AB+AC (right distributivity)
  5. (A+B)C=AC+BC (left distributivity)
  6. (αβ)A=α(βA)
  7. α(AB)=(αA)B=A(αB)
  8. (α+β)A=αA+βA
  9. α(A+B)=αA+αB


Theorem 1.3.3

If A and B are nonsingular n×n matrices, then AB is also nonsingular and (AB)−1=B−1A−1

(note the opposite order on the right-hand side)

Corollary

For nonsingular matrices A1,…,Ak, A1A2…Ak is also nonsingular and (A1A2…Ak)−1=Ak−1…A2−1A1−1


Theorem 1.4.2

Equivlent Conditions for Nonsingularity

Let A be a n×n matrix. Then the following are equivalent:

  1. A is nonsingular
  2. Ax→=0→ has only trivial solution 0→
  3. A is row equivalent to identity matrix of size n (A∼In)

Proof

(1) → (2): Let x^ be solution of Ax→=0→. So Ax^=0→ can become A−1Ax^=A−10→. Ix^=0→, so x^=0→

(2) → (3): Rewrite Ax→=0→ in row echelon form as Ux→=0→. If one diagonal entry of U is 0, then there is at least one free variable and infinitely many solutions, one of which is nonzero. This leads to a contradiction, so all diagonal entries of U must be 1, so rref will be identity matrix.

(3) → (1): If

A

is row equivalent to

I

, then there exists a sequence of elementary matrices

E1,…,Ek

such that

∏i=k1Ei=A

. Therefore,

A−1=∏k=1kEi−1

(note reverse order), so

A

is nonsingular.

Q.E.D.


Corollary

The n×n system of equations Ax→=b→ has a unique solution iff A is nonsingular.

Proof
  • A is nonsingular, Ax→=b→ can be rewritten as x^=A−1b→
  • Assume unique solution x^ exists. If A were singular then homogeneous system Ax→=0→ would have a nonzero solution y→≠0→ (by Theorem 1.4.2). If this were the case, ... there would be another solution, which is a contradiction.
    Q.E.D.

Chapter 2

Theorem 2.1.1

The determinant can be expressed as a cofactor expansion using any row or column of A:

|A|=∑k=1naikAik=∑k=1nakjAkj
1≤i,j≤n


Theorem 2.1.2

If A is a n×n matrix, then |AT|=|A|


Theorem 2.1.3

If A is a triangular matrx, then |A| is equal to the product of the diagonal entries of A.

Proof

Proof by Induction.

Basis step. determinant of 2×2 matrix is product of diagonals.

Inductive step. Assuming determinant of

n−1×n−1

matrix is product of diagonals,

n×n

can be formed by adding a nonzero row to the top, and a zero column with

a11

nonzero to the

n−1×n−1matrix

. The determinant would just be

a11A11

.

Q.E.D.


Theorem 2.1.4

For a n×n matrix A

  1. If A has a row or column consisting entirely of 0s, then |A|=0
  2. If A has two identical rows or two identical columns, then |A|=0

Theorem x.x.x

A n×n matrix A is singular iff |A|=0.

Proof

A can be reduced to row echelon form by a finite number of row operations. This means that U=(∏i=k1Ei)A is an upper triangular matrix whose determinant is (∏i=k1|Ei|)|A|=∏i=1nuii. The determinants of elementary matrices will never be zero, so if the determinant of A is zero, then at least one row of U must be all 0.

Such a matrix cannot be row-equivalent to

I

and therefore cannot have an inverse.

Q.E.D.

Theorem x.x.x

|AB|=|A||B|

Proof

If B is singular, it follows from #Theorem 1.5.2 that AB is also singular (see exercise 14 of Section 1.5). Therefore |AB|=0 if A or B is singular.

Let

B

be nonsingular, so

B=∏i=k1Ei

Therefore,

|AB|=|A∏i=k1Ei|

. By separating the elementary matrices from the determinant, we arrive that

|A|∏i=k1|Ei|=|A||B|

.

Q.E.D.