MARB 403 Lab 3

From Notes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

« previous | Saturday, January 5, 2012 | next »

Our group led this discussion

Common Bottlenose Dolphin

Authors:

  • Michael D. Scott
  • Randall S. Wells
Edit.png

Page Under Construction
This page still needs revision. Please edit this page to finish it.


Decline in Relative Abundance of Bottlenose Dolphins Exposed to Long-Term Disturbance

Authors:

  • Lars Bejder
  • Richard Connor
  • Cindy Flaherty
  • Nick Gales
  • Mike Heithaus
  • Michael Krützen
  • Janet Mann
  • Amy Samuels
  • Jana Watson-Capps
  • Hal Whitehead
Edit.png

Page Under Construction
This page still needs revision. Please edit this page to finish it.

This only includes the sections I worked on for the presentation


Methods

Experimental Design

Experimental site: GPS-Tracking tourism boats in a 36 km2 Control site: adjacent 36 km2 site with minimal activity: no tourism and little research boats

3 time periods:

  • T0 (Mar 1988 — Apr 1993): before tourism
  • T1 (May 1993 — Jul 1998): 1 tour vessel
  • T2 (Aug 1998 — Jan 2003): 2 tour vessels

exposure estimated in each time period and in each location (6 data points)

encounter = at least 1 minute within 50 m of dolphins (based on license)

Data sources:

  • long-term research database
  • 188 monitored tour trips in 2000 (representative of all years of operation)

abundance based on photo ID from survey records:

Time Period Tourist Area Control Area
No. dolphins identified % identified as individuals No. dolphins identified % identified as individuals
T0 2714 90.4% 42 71.4%
T1 6261 90.7% 1548 73.2
T3 8863 94.6 1812 76.3
Note: % identified = # dolphins identified / total # dolphins observed

Both areas divided into grid squares (repeated for 1 and 4 km2)

Dolphin abundance estimation formulas

  • — number of identified individuals per square per period (dependent variable)
  • — total number of survey records per square per period (independent variable)
  • — estimated number of dolphins in a particular square (estimated variable)
  • — proportional rate of change of dolphin abundance between time periods (assumed equal for all squares) (estimated constant)
  • — rate of population size increase in each square (assumed equal for all squares) (estimated constant)

Results

Dolphin Exposure to Tour and Research Vessels

Averaged

  • encounters per trip: 1.86
  • duration: 10.63±7.33 minutes
  • daily trips for T1: 2.5 (out of 4 possible)
  • daily trips for T2: 5.5 (out of 8)


Time spent with dolphins (in hrs/day) by type of vessel
Time Period Tourist Area Control Area
Tour Research Total Tour Research Total
T0 0 0.54 0.54 0 0.006 0.006
T1 0.82 0.41 1.23 0 0.039 0.039
T2 1.82 0.77 2.59 0 0.099 0.099

Changes in Dolphin Abundance

Little change from T0 to T1 in both areas and both grid sizes

Change in Dolphin Abundance from T1 to T2

Note: CI95 = 95% confidence interval

there is a 95% chance that the actual change in dolphin abundance is within this range

Recall that dolphin abundance values are estimates of the actual population
  Tourist Area Control Area
% change 95% CI % change 95% CI
1 km2 grid -14.9% / km2 [-20.8%, -8.23%] +8.5% / km2 [-4.0%, +16.7% ]
4 km2 grid -18.2% / 4 km2 [-25.02%, -0.77%] +2.4% / 4 km2 [-14.16%, +20.57%]

Overall trend: significant decrease in tourist area, nonsignificant increase in control area

1 km2 grid size result was more conservative (smaller confidence interval)

On average, every 1 in 7 dolphins left

Discussion